about the recently revised
decision to the Rules of Golf
is misleading. You were
close, but with the Rules
of Golf, close is simply not
good enough.
Though I applaud you
for placing the Rules at
the forefront, this revised
decision will have no
impact in 99 percent of golf
played around the world.
As Mike Davis said during
the announcement, its
application will be “very,
very small.” Yet, publications
everywhere, including GGP,
are raising the banner as
if they have won the battle
against the Ruling Bodies
and silenced Armchair
Rules Officials everywhere.
You even mention Camilo
Villegas as an example –
this is simply wrong. What
happened to Camilo was the
result of a call-in, yet the
revision would not change
the result of his situation.
Your mention of him only
misleads casual golf fans and
less informed Committees
the world over. Thanks for
the mention, but I take great
exception in that you have
made the job of rules officials
more difficult as we will
now struggle to explain to
players who generally have
little knowledge of the Rules
anyway why the DQ stands
and the revised decision has
nothing to do with situations
like Camilo and themselves ...
that being a golfer who simply
never took the time to learn
the rules of this great game.
GGP: You said a mouthful,
Craig. And you are welcome
to your opinion about what
“misleads” and what doesn’t.
Obviously, we disagree
with you on that score.
Camilo would have been
DQ’d under the old and/
or new rule and we didn’t
report that incorrectly.
But, more important and
to the larger issue, you are
spot on about the general
ignorance, among players
who should know better, of
the rules. Cheers again to
Dottie Pepper, who, earlier
this year in a GGP interview,
said one of the first things
she would do if she was the
empress of golf, would force
all top players to attend rules
schools.
S
If you had one last
round of golf to
play, where would
you play it and
why?
Jeff Posts: It was
refreshing to read your
piece (Editor Brian Hewitt’s
column earlier this year). No
real punches pulled. Having
experienced being around
LPGA players as the head
professional of the Kraft
Nabisco for many years, as
well as PGA players. I have
always found the attitude one
of giving and graciousness.
GGP: This is in response to
Hewitt’s column supporting
the decision to have prize
money for one LPGA event
go to charity. It was a stirring
success. And when all was
said and done, the players
understood it was a win-win-win-win proposition for them.
Readers: Opinions, please.
E-mail Contact@GlobalGolfPost.com
Facebook www.facebook.com/Global Golf Post
Twitter@GlobalGolf Post